Had this pic sent in today from a seller who has a dispatch time of under 1 hour who is getting blamed for late deliveries. eBay say the seller is responsible for a reasonable dispatch time and that’s fair, but what happens after who is at fault? well according to eBay you are.
Just read that and think about it, YOU had late deliveries, no the courier did or maybe they never, considering the fact that eBay themselfs are now giving delivery dates to buyers that are totally unreasonable. In 1 example eBay still seem to think Royal Mail 1st class standard is a 24hr service…
Random collection of users thoughts on eBay/PayPal gathered up from various places wherever eBay just happened to be mentioned, maybe its worth noting that in any totally unrelated forum post, thread, email at any point someone mentions eBay or PayPal a crap load of stories start coming out from random users, what does that tell you? The original thread could have been about how to shave a cat, but the min eBay somehow works its way in there everything goes to sh*t.
There are tales where paypal freeze your account for upto 180 day, and the can because you agree to it when you sign up.
A few interesting search terms have popped up this week in relation to eBay.
ebay new top rated seller requirements are too high
ebay seller sent a empty box
iphone ebay scam
There was a few search’s relating to the new seller requirements that were bought in this month, from what I have seen it has even managed to remove a few top rated sellers who have done absolutely nothing wrong. MC999 is the typical warning form for listing violations and usually makes little sense. As usual when eBay change something there’s a increase in traffic to sites like this I wonder why that is…
A strange example of eBay buyer behavior this, buyer buys a cable it gets lost in the post, the seller has the tracking info and all is true, seller refunds the buyer, now the buyer does not know what kind of feedback to leave and says they know it was not the sellers fault. Now if only the other 9/10 idiots who lurk on eBay would take note of this, the post is beyond the control of the seller!
Had these very interesting screenshots sent in, there the feedback pages from a seller who at the time had over 3000 items listed, you will notice a reoccurring theme, mainly items not turning up, yet the buyer signed for them? my favorite is 1 incident where a buyer has opened a case against the seller, lost and then left negative feedback about it, how can eBay allow that? the buyers claim was found to be BS so how come the sellers still suffering for it???
The day of the week were we take a quick look at what the website traffic monitor tool thingy has thrown up. Slightly more terms than usual, I think because the sites traffic is increasing no idea why is eBay getting worse surely not :p
A story from 2012 detailing how eBay took a profit making business and drove it into the ground, the end result being the staff on job seekers allowance. The reason given for this mess seems to be in the DSR system which everyone knows is a complete load of crap, in this case the seller had got 13 low DSRs based on a sales figure of about £12k to £15k a month so I don’t know how many items that is, the article says it was 2% of the sales that left the low scores, 13 out of 568 ,but this seems totally crazy to me.
A new one on me this only found out this morning, eBay charge a fee for a seller ending there auction early, as usual theirs not much info on this in eBay’s help pages (wonder why) and forum posts on eBay’s forums are all dead links now (I wonder who did that?). The charge is equal to the amount of the auction when you ended it (final value fee). This just seems like a pure scam, there could be many reasons to end a auction early that are legitimate, eBay just assume there losing something, you do get 1 free end per 12 months though, I can’t see how this works when you have already paid a insertion fee. Is it even legal?